🔗 Share this article

The composer Avril Coleridge-Taylor continually bore the pressure of her parent’s legacy. As the offspring of the renowned Samuel Coleridge-Taylor, a leading the most famous British composers of the early 20th century, the composer’s name was enveloped in the long shadows of the past.

An Inaugural Recording

Earlier this year, I contemplated these legacies as I prepared to make the inaugural album of the composer’s piano concerto from 1936. With its emotional harmonies, heartfelt tunes, and valiant rhythms, Avril’s work will offer audiences fascinating insight into how this artist – a wartime composer who entered the world in 1903 – conceived of her world as a artist with mixed heritage.

Legacy and Reality

But here’s the thing about the past. It requires time to adapt, to recognize outlines as they really are, to tell reality from misrepresentation, and I had been afraid to confront the composer’s background for a while.

I earnestly desired the composer to be following in her father’s footsteps. Partially, that held. The idyllic English tones of Samuel’s influence can be heard in many of her works, for example From the Hills (1934) and Sussex Landscape (1940). But you only have to review the titles of her family’s music to understand how he identified as not just a standard-bearer of English Romanticism as well as a voice of the African heritage.

At this point parent and child seemed to diverge.

The United States evaluated Samuel by the mastery of his music as opposed to the his racial background.

Family Background

While he was studying at the Royal College of Music, Samuel – the son of a parent from Sierra Leone and a Caucasian parent – turned toward his background. Once the Black American writer the renowned Dunbar arrived in England in that era, the aspiring artist actively pursued him. He composed this literary work to music and the subsequent year adapted his verses for a musical work, Dream Lovers. Subsequently arrived the choral piece that made him famous: Hiawatha’s Wedding Feast.

Based on the poet Longfellow’s The Song of Hiawatha, this composition was an worldwide sensation, notably for Black Americans who felt indirect honor as the majority judged Samuel by the excellence of his music rather than the his background.

Advocacy and Beliefs

Fame failed to diminish his activism. At the turn of the century, he attended the initial Pan African gathering in the UK where he made the acquaintance of the prominent scholar this influential figure and observed a series of speeches, including on the oppression of Black South Africans. He was a campaigner to his final days. He sustained relationships with trailblazers for equality such as Du Bois and this leader, spoke publicly on ending discrimination, and even discussed issues of racism with President Theodore Roosevelt on a trip to the presidential residence in the early 1900s. Regarding his compositions, Du Bois recalled, “he made his mark so notably as a creative artist that it will endure.” He died in that year, in his thirties. Yet how might Samuel have made of his child’s choice to be in South Africa in the that decade?

Conflict and Policy

“Child of Celebrated Artist shows support to apartheid system,” declared a title in the community journal Jet magazine. The system “appeared to me the right policy”, Avril told Jet. When pushed to clarify, she revised her statement: she did not support with this policy “as a concept” and it “could be left to run its course, overseen by well-meaning residents of every background”. If Avril had been more attuned to her family’s principles, or from segregated America, she may have reconsidered about this system. But life had shielded her.

Heritage and Innocence

“I possess a British passport,” she said, “and the authorities never asked me about my race.” Therefore, with her “porcelain-white” appearance (as described), she floated alongside white society, lifted by their admiration for her renowned family member. She delivered a lecture about her parent’s compositions at the Cape Town university and conducted the South African Broadcasting Corporation Orchestra in Johannesburg, programming the bold final section of her Piano Concerto, named: “In remembrance of my Father.” Even though a skilled pianist on her own, she avoided playing as the featured artist in her work. Instead, she consistently conducted as the leader; and so the apartheid orchestra performed under her direction.

She desired, in her own words, she “might bring a transformation”. But by 1954, circumstances deteriorated. When government agents learned of her mixed background, she could no longer stay the nation. Her British passport offered no defense, the diplomatic official advised her to leave or risk imprisonment. She went back to the UK, embarrassed as the magnitude of her innocence dawned. “This experience was a hard one,” she stated. Compounding her humiliation was the 1955 publication of her unfortunate magazine feature, a year after her forced leaving from that nation.

A Recurring Theme

As I sat with these legacies, I felt a known narrative. The account of identifying as British until it’s challenged – which recalls troops of color who served for the UK during the second world war and survived only to be not given their earned rewards. Along with the Windrush era,